Windows Vista = the newest product of a software government that is completely against freedom. Microsoft = anti freedom. There are those who say they are not "religious" about software. To the contrary what are they really saying? They certainly do not mean to reconnect to the source. Which is what the real definition stands for. They do not mean to be moral, which is implied in the real definition? or do they do they mean they are not moral? They certainly mean that they are pro government of software... in paticular they are willing to play ball with a government that is anti freedom. »

We'll there has to be limits. When we talk about Gnu/Linux we are talking about freedom. Now if I am starving and doing my best then with in reason I am willing to do things that I am normally not willing to do. That is okay because we all give in to weakness. As long as we are doing are best. However let us not forget that when we give in to non freedom that it makes it harder for the next guy. We want freedom to be easy because in fact that is the only cost to freedom in this world today. How hard is it to be free? So if I already make enough to eat and I work and contribute to freedom in general and some one comes along and tries to appeal to my sense of greed so that I'll support non free... well that is not right. This article makes me loose respect for this magazine. If I keep seeing this magazine support non free then I'll have to abandon it completely. »

I agree that linux is moving very quick. Let us rember that what makes linux awesome is that it is used by the GNU and its important to rember that the GNU is most of the OS most of the time. Let us support GNU more and more and not linux per se'. The next few years is going to show more and more weaknesses in the Linux model. We must keep strong for the puposes stated in the GNU user agreement! Do not sell our the soul of GNU if you will for exceptiance that would be counter productive! »